|
|
Post by aceofspades on Jul 24, 2006 21:30:39 GMT -5
i want a sword. i bet you could take that silly 50 cal if you had a sword like highlander.  |
|
|
|
Post by TEX on Jul 25, 2006 14:59:37 GMT -5
he wouldn't even shoot! I'd be inside before I did anything, so he doesn't really matter
|
|
|
|
Post by Chu-Chu on Jul 26, 2006 10:48:04 GMT -5
You mean you're not going to pull out a sword outside the surrounding fence and charge headlong at the front door? Huh... Stratiegery... Bush would be proud. Might I suggest, Ninja? I'll help.
~Chu
|
|
|
|
Post by TEX on Jul 26, 2006 15:20:14 GMT -5
no way i'd dishonor myself by needing a ninja. Sry Chu
|
|
|
|
Post by Chu-Chu on Jul 27, 2006 8:20:24 GMT -5
I wasn't suggesting you USE a ninja, I was suggesting you BE a ninja... Steath, distraction, covert... ya know.. NINJA VANISH! And I just want to help... sounds like fun!
~Chu
|
|
|
|
Post by TEX on Jul 27, 2006 15:35:46 GMT -5
A true warrior doesn't hide, doesn't vanish, doesn't cheat. If his opponent is asleep, he wakes them up and arms them himself before attacking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Canadian Nose on Jul 27, 2006 16:57:15 GMT -5
A true warrior sounds pretty stupid to me.
NINJA STYLE!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chu-Chu on Jul 27, 2006 18:07:19 GMT -5
I'm not saying don't fight honorably, I'm saying, use ninja tricks to get into Bush's room, then do the honerable thing and fight him. But he's being a coward by having that many armed guards stationed about. Use the ninja tricks to get past the guards only.
~Chu
|
|
|
|
Post by Moe on Jul 28, 2006 1:37:59 GMT -5
A true warrior sounds pretty stupid to me. NINJA STYLE! I won't name Names but I think Nose is stupid.  Why would you have to Ninja style if a true warrior mainly fights his opponents during the day. |
|
|
|
Post by Canadian Nose on Jul 28, 2006 14:38:51 GMT -5
If your opponent is sleeping. You dont wake him up. Thats just stupid. Thats a way to get a sword run through you. Or shot. If hes sleeping, and the object is to kill him, only REASONABLE thing to do is kill him. if Killing him Before he kills you is the objective, isnt it better to kill him while incapacitated? (sp.)
|
|
|
|
Post by TEX on Jul 28, 2006 17:33:36 GMT -5
it's lame though, it's too easy. The objective is not to kill them before they kill you. The objective is to FIGHT them. If he defeats you, and earns the right to live, then so be it, but if he loses, he dies.
|
|
|
|
Post by aceofspades on Jul 29, 2006 0:12:19 GMT -5
hmmm... that seems logical
|
|
|
|
Post by TEX on Jul 30, 2006 4:47:29 GMT -5
Nothing in this world is 'logical' anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by Chu-Chu on Jul 31, 2006 9:15:34 GMT -5
I believe you are missing the point. Coup de Grais requires no honor or no fight. Although, it is a necessary act in order to make the world a better place. Who will accept the mission?
~Chu
|
|
|
|
Post by TEX on Jul 31, 2006 23:45:15 GMT -5
In light of the fact that the FBI are monitering, I will say:
I am NOT (wink) planning to kill the president
I am NOT (wink) planning on overthroughing our current government
and I am NOT (wink) planning on attacking the white house to take revenge on my grandpa
|
|
